Cornyn: Supreme court confirmation vote likely after Labor Day

The second-ranked Senate GOP leader on Thursday suggested the final Court confirmation vote to replace Anthony Kennedy would be held in September, saying he "might be shocked" should the vote happened before Labor Day.

Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) added that he’s "not opposed" to moving President Donald Trump’s nominee quicker, but he noted that record checks on Trump’s still-unnamed pick will likely devote some time.

Story Continued Below

Republicans formerly made clear that they can don’t plan to heed Democratic requires a delay during the Supreme court confirmation until after November’s election to give midterm voters enable you to weigh in.

Supreme Court nominees for the reason that Ford administration spent an average of 67 days between their nomination and final confirmation, in accordance with a 2015 report from your Congressional Research Service – a window that Cornyn told reporters he "would endorse" to be a goal. However, that figure doesn’t include President Barack Obama’s Supreme court nominee, Merrick Garland, whom Republicans blocked and denied a confirmation hearing in 2016.

Republican senators anticipate dedicating the majority of August to passing appropriations bills, e . g your final Supreme Court vote would hold back until September. The top court’s next term is about to get started on over the first Monday of October.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), however, declined to decide to any timetable.

"Things are gonna be judged by as soon as the president bakes an appointment as well as what [Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell wishes to schedule," Grassley said. At this moment, it is all speculation. And there’s no reason in speculating."

Cornyn also cautioned Trump against selecting any nominee which includes a publicly stated position on overturning court precedents like Roe v. Wade.

"I feel that is a horrible mistake, to your president to nominate someone that had that sort of agenda," Cornyn told reporters, adding that "for no reason need judges that have either personal or political or ideological agendas, in my view. And that will actually comfort many of us."

It’s common for presidents of each party to protect yourself from deciding on a nominee with a lengthy paper trail for opponents to seize on, though Trump has previously said however would like to appoint anti-abortion judges towards the high court.

One part of Trump’s Supreme court shortlist, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), has championed anti-abortion legislation, although he suggested Thursday that Roe could possibly be safer after Kennedy’s retirement than some about the left have argued.

Burgess Everett resulted in this report.

Related posts

Pelosi, Schumer blast Trump's criticism of Germany


Republicans brace for brutal Supreme Court fight


McCaskill braces for SCOTUS onslaught


1 comment

Leave a Comment

Skip to toolbar